Environmental Impact Review/Permitting
Government-Sponsored Developments
Sive, Paget & Riesel is regularly trusted by public sponsors of large commercial, retail, residential and industrial development projects to supervise the preparation of Environmental Impact Statements (EISs) and assessments under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), permitting and litigation. Our attorneys have served as environmental counsel on projects such as the Brooklyn Bridge Park, sponsored by the Brooklyn Bridge Park Development Corporation, JFK Rail Link sponsored by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, the Javits Convention Center, sponsored by the New York State Urban Development Corporation and the Javits Convention Center expansion, the South Street Seaport development, the Hunters Point Waterfront Redevelopment Project and the Willets Point Redevelopment Project, sponsored by the City of New York and the New York City Economic Development Corporation. The Firm also serves as environmental counsel to the Long Island Power Authority, where its project work has included the environmental review for an electric transmission project on the East End of Long Island. Our attorneys served as environmental counsel to the New York State Thruway Authority in connection with Tappan Zee Bridge/I-287 Corridor Project, and for the Hudson Yards Development Corporation in connection with the redevelopment of the Hudson Yards on the far west side of Manhattan.
Private Commercial Developments
We represent private developers throughout the country in the environmental review and permitting processes and, if necessary, in subsequent litigation. Our experience includes large urban projects such as New York City’s Metrotech Center, Riverside South as well as handling the expansion of the U.S.T.A.’s National Tennis Center and construction of the New Yankee Stadium. Our lawyers also have experience with large suburban projects including planned unit development in Newburgh and Montgomery New York and the Milford Senior Housing Project in Port Washington, New York.
In New York City, we have unparalleled experience in shepherding projects through the review and approval process on properties subject to E-Designations under the New York City Zoning Resolution. As part of this practice, we work closely with environmental engineers, architects, mechanical engineers and air modeling experts to meet City regulatory requirements for environmental investigations and implementation of remedial plans addressing air quality, noise and hazardous materials.
Permitting
Our attorneys regularly analyze proposed project permitting requirements, and interface with regulators at the national, state and local level to assist clients with permit applications, modifications, renewals and compliance for a range of environmental permitting schemes. We have unparalleled expertise in obtaining permits for general construction projects, industrial facilities, including air, solid waste and other types of permits for a range of industries, including co-generation facilities, coal slurry projects, refineries, PCB-reclamation companies and wastewater treatment plants.
We have extensive experience navigating the numerous federal, state, and local statutes and regulations which govern wetlands and water quality issues, including stormwater. Whether obtaining coverage under a general stormwater permit for a construction site or evaluating a proposed project’s potential impacts on tidal or freshwater wetlands, our attorneys are deeply knowledgeable in this area, and have substantial experience working with the relevant governmental agencies.
Atlantic Yards – Barclays Center
The Governor Mario Cuomo Bridge
Queens West Development Corporation
City Point
Victoria Theatre Redevelopment
Prince’s Point
SPR represented Muss Development Corporation with respect to a proposed large-scale residential development on Prince's Point, which borders Staten Island. Shortly after Muss purchased the property, it was discovered to be seriously contaminated with hazardous wastes from historic uses, resulting in its listing as an Inactive Hazardous Waste Disposal Site under the State Superfund Program. SPR provided legal advice pertaining to the remediation of the site, which took many years to complete, and successfully sued the prior owner for response costs under CERCLA. SPR also provided representation concerning State Tidal and Freshwater Wetlands permitting and associated environmental issues. SPR subsequently advised the purchaser of the property in complying with overlapping requirements of permits and consent orders governing development.
Hudson River Park
From its inception, SPR has served as environmental and litigation counsel to the Hudson River Park Trust on major proposed projects in Hudson River Park, most recently Little Island, Pier 57, and Gansevoort Peninsula. Little Island is a distinctive pier offering world-class recreation and performing arts events, with the support of a donation from the Diller/von Furstenberg Family Foundation – the largest gift to a public park in the history of New York State. Little Island was the subject of litigation in state and federal court for over two years, during which SPR successfully overcame a challenge to the Trust’s environmental review and a challenge to the permit issued by the DEC (as co-counsel with the State). SPR also helped the Trust obtain new permits after the donor terminated and then restarted the Project. Pier 57 was transformed from its original maritime use to an indoor/outdoor public space and food hall. SPR advised the Trust with respect to the preparation of an environmental impact statement for Pier 57 as well as obtaining environmental permits. The Gansevoort Peninsula is a public beach and passive recreation space that replaces a former sanitation facility. SPR advised on environmental permitting and represented the Trust in litigation challenging the Gansevoort Peninsula project.
Arthur Kill Terminal
American Museum of Natural History
Yankee Stadium
SPR represented the New York Yankees in connection with the development of the new Yankee stadium in the Bronx. The project also included the construction of additional parking facilities, and the creation of new parkland and recreational facilities at and in the immediate vicinity of the existing stadium, as well as along the Harlem River waterfront. The firm successfully defended the New York Yankees in the lawsuit that challenged the environmental review and parkland aspect of this project.
Battery Park City Authority – Resiliency Projects
Edge-On-Hudson
MTA Congestion Pricing
Financial District Seaport Resiliency
BQE Central Project
Prologis
Redevelopment of Former Domino Sugar Factory
The firm represents The Refinery, LLC, the developer of the former Domino Sugar facility on the East River in Brooklyn, with regard to waterfront permitting. The proposed development involves construction of new buildings that will include up to 120,000 gross square feet (gsf) of retail/commercial space, up to 100,000 gsf of community facility use, and up to 2,400 residential units (2.64 million gsf). Thirty percent of the units will be offered as affordable housing. In addition, the project includes development of approximately 4.1 acres of public open space including an approximately 1-acre lawn at the center of the site and a waterfront esplanade along the East River.
Thor Equities Industrial Logistics Development
Two Trees River Ring Project
Whole Foods Supermarket – Gowanus, Brooklyn
Willets Point Development Project
Thor Equities Retail Development – Brooklyn
Thor Equities Retail Development – Red Hook
NYSERDA – Offshore Wind
Equinor Wind – Empire Wind Offshore Wind Projects
NYSERDA – Western New York Nuclear Service Center at West Valley
Lenox Hill Hospital
Bayonne Bridge Navigational Clearance Program
Hudson Valley Shakespeare Festival
Long Island Power Authority – Jones Beach Energy & Nature Center
Indian Point Energy Center Relicensing/Decommissioning
Silvercup West Studios
Goethals Bridge
Pier 94
Javits Convention Center
SPR represents Empire State Development Corporation (“ESD”) and has represented both the Jacob Javits Development and Operating Corporations in the environmental review of the proposed expansion of the Convention Center. This representation included the review of the preparation of the Hudson Yards EIS, which analyzed the Convention Center expansion, extension of the number 7 subway line and the rezoning of the Hudson Yards. The Firm also represented ESD and the Javits Development Corporation in assessing the need for a supplemental EIS when changes were made in the proposed expansion design and successfully defended in litigation the determination not to prepare a supplemental EIS.
United Hospital Redevelopment
Millennium Pipeline Company Litigation
Kingsboro Psychiatric Center
Brooklyn Developmental Center
La Guardia AirTrain
Port Authority of NY & New Jersey – Bus Terminal
Cape Cod Offshore Wind Farm
Greenpoint Landing
Watch Case Factory
“Local Law 97’s ‘Mediated Resolution’ Clause Gives Too Much Leeway for Exemptions, Lawyers Say”
For: City Limits Article by Mariana Simões
“Environmental Law: Developments in the Law of SEQRA”
For: Syracuse Law Review
“Environmental Aspects of Energy Development”
For: ALI Environmental Law Conference
“Environmental Law: Developments in the Law of SEQRA”
For: Syracuse Law Review Vol. 73, No. 717
Article Title: Developments in the Law of SEQRA
“Environmental Law: Developments in the Law of SEQRA”
For: Syracuse Law Review Vol. 72, No. 687
Article Title: Developments in the Law of SEQRA
“Lands Under Water in NYC: Foundation of Waterfront Development”
For: Fordham Law School
“Environmental Law: Developments in the Law of SEQRA”
For: 71 Syracuse L. Rev. 329
“What Your Phase I Won’t Tell You About Developing a Waterfront Site in New York City”
For: Environmental Law in New York Vol. 31, No. 79
“Environmental Law: Developments in the Law of SEQRA, 2017-2018 Survey of New York Law”
For: Syracuse Law Review, Vol. 69, No. 4
“Navigating Urban Waterway Development”
For: Center for Creative Land Recycling
“Environmental Impact Review in New York”
For: Matthew Bender Elite Products
“Wetlands Regulations: Considerations for Project Developers”
For: Lexis Practice Advisor Practice Note
“Environmental Law: Developments in the Law of SEQRA”
For: 68 Syracuse Law Review 837; Co-Author(s): Mark A. Chertok, Katherine Ghilain Trudell
“Land Under Water in NYC: What It Is & Why It Matters”
For: American Planning Association NY Metro Chapter Panel
“The Impact of Weakening Chevron Deference on Environmental Deregulation”
For: Columbia Law Review
“Environmental Law: Developments in the Law of SEQRA”
For: 67 Syracuse Law Review 897
“SEQR: 2017 Proposed SEQR Amendments”
For: CLE Panelist, NYSBA
“Environmental Impact Review in New York”
For: Michael Gerrard, ed.; Matthew Bender, pub, Chapter 8A
“Environmental Law: Developments in the Law of SEQRA”
For: 66 Syracuse Law Review 905
“Accelerated Environmental Review of Infrastructure Projects”
For: NYSBA Environmental Law Section Annual Meeting
“NEPA and Little NEPAs and Environmental Litigation”
For: ALI-ABA
“The National Environmental Policy Act”
For: Boot Camp Course on Environmental Law, ELI Boot Camp
“Improving Community Character Analysis in the SEQRA Environmental Impact Review Process: A Cultural Landscape Approach to Defining the Elusive “Community Character”
For: 17 New York University Environmental Law Journal 1194